Posted by: bob parmelee

Preview: Obama may tank faster than the Titanic.

He is championing the right causes but…
Put simply, people are not as gullible as they used to be.

On the war front:
The administration is expanding our wars on and off budget,
increasing the use of agencies like Prince’s Blackwater militia in areas
like Afghanistan. Blackwater is part of the CIA assassination program
which uses a private militia to fill in where official government action
could be called into question. They operate above the law, courtesy
of policies established in the Bush administration, and they cost
at least 10 times what our own military personnel would cost.
And the deaths of their forces don’t enter into “official” statistics.

On the health front:
It is hard for many Americans NOT to hold obese people
or drug addicts or people with unwanted pregnancies responsible
for their condition. While aids has lost steam as a major contributor
to death in our nation, to fight the disease costs a fortune and it is hard NOT to hold the indiscriminate drug user or sex deviant responsible for the consequences of their actions. People who live on Big Macs and dingdongs at the expense of their bodies earn little sympathy from those who protect their body’s health with a proper diet. Unwanted pregnancies are a result of raging hormones, but are also a result of a disgusting head in the sand approach to sex education on the part of our government. The backward facing Bush administration and religious communities can be held directly responsible for the lack of responsible sex education but we all share the burden of these irresponsible policies.

We can’t trust the government to solve our problems since they are in many respects enablers. We can’t expect “for profit” businesses like insurance companies not to capitalize on opportunities created by our own personal lack of self discipline or self-respect.

So our only answer is to rely upon ourselves, our own good judgment,
and the hope that wisdom and experience will win out.

Geez we are in trouble.



Under: Politics
12 Aug 2009

It seems impossible to believe that the President’s

mandate has been squashed already.

 

But facts are facts.  The party of “no” can’t

promulgate any policies worth following but

they seem to be able to torpedo anything

which may benefit the “average” American.

 

The “average” American, by my definition,

is a person who works for a living. This precludes

the “fat cats” who have already earned or inherited

enough money to live forever.  It does include

the “low cats” who can’t afford the price of a cup

of coffee at Starbucks.  It includes about 300

million Americans.

 

It includes everybody everywhere who contributes

to the “industrial nations” statistics, or those who

belong to the wealthiest nations category

of which we are, temporarily, number one.

 

It includes those nations (28 of them) who have

better standards of living than ours.  It includes

all those nations who have better health care

then we do.  It includes every nation who educates

their children better than we do.  It includes virtually

every nation included in the third world category…

 

It is time to change our statistics.  Any politics

which contributed to the previous 40 years of failed

policies need to be jettisoned.  Those who seek

to perpetuate those policies are either in the top

1% of income earners (it would be ridiculous to

suggest to these winners that they change what

works for them– voluntarily) or are those brain-dead

among us who have never have enjoyed the Eureka

moment which accompanies an original thought.

In other words, the incredible majority of Americans

who have been brainwashed into believing the drivel

of past administrations or current lobbyists are not

in a position to move us into a better place.

 

Either we get ahead of the curve or we will suffer

the disgrace of losers who populate the rubble of history.

This could be a fitting eulogy:

 

Fellow Romans,

We learned nothing from your failed republic. In fact,

we took your arrogance to a whole new level.  We actually

try to outspend the rest of the combined budgets among the

planet’s various militarys on a military offensive budget

(misnomer = “defense”) against no certain enemy.  Your

losing strategy to conquer the world we proudly embrace although

it will bury us in the rock pile of past great civilations like yours.

 

 

President Barak Obama needs to bully this nation into

the 21st century. And he needs to stick by his campaign

promises. All the arguments to the contrary are

assuring our speedy descent into a has been super power.

We are not far from Russia my friends.  They are currently,

if not always, in the grip of gangsters who pillage and plunder

their economy at will.  We’re on the edge.

 

Bob Parmelee                       Robert-Parmelee.blogspot.com

 

 

 



Brainwashing

Posted by: bob parmelee
Under: Recent Posts
5 May 2009

 

Interesting concept.  Taken at face value I guess it could mean laundering the dirt from our brains.

 

But brains don’t have dirt.  I know this from watching Grey’s anatomy.  So it must mean something else.

 

How about this? Brainwashing means replacing either what was already in your brain with something else or placing something in a space in your brain formally unoccupied.

 

The result of washing anything is supposed to be a positive experience.  In actuality brainwashing never is.  I can say that because I know brainwashing either modifies ideas gained by your own experience, or brainwashing puts ideas of others in your head which you now claim as your own.

 

In either case you are now no longer your own man.  Pieces of you, or more importantly pieces of your brain, are now in the care and custody of other’s thoughts.

 

All people are good people at birth and most people manage to stay that way through life.  Most people just want to live and let live.

 

But some of us are really sick, and who can say why.  When good people fall victim to brainwashing from extremists and sickos and don’t have the advantage of contrary points of view bad things happen.

 

Fighting terrorism with an army is ridiculous.  Armies never get inside anyone’s head; they only destroy their bodies. Fighting terrorism is a one-on-one business.  You must win over people by example.  You can only show them a better way; you can’t force them to follow you.  We must lead by example, not try to force compliance.  One must show respect, not contempt, for people of different faiths and their beliefs.

 

 



E-mail Attitudes

Posted by: bob parmelee
Under: Recent Posts
5 Mar 2009

 

 

Everybody has one.  Nobody’s is the same.

Some say let the sun shine in.  Others don’t

want anything more than a single ray to get

through their filter.

 

So what happened?  Who won?  I guess you

could say two opposites developed. Google,

on one side, said give me all your mail, spam

and all.  I’ve got storage for everything.

 

AOL, on the other hand, said they needed

permission from their client’s to forward anything

at all to their inboxes.  “Unless you, the sender,

are white-listed by our client, your mail will be

forwarded to the trash can”.

 

Every other mail service like Yahoo, MSN, AT&T,

etc. all have different tolerance levels.  This

spawned a whole bunch of bad grammar. All of a

sudden money became mo*ney, and free became

fr*e or fr.ee.  I am an agreeable guy but I don’t

like my lexicon mangled.

 

Here is my open letter to my provider:

 

Dear filter screen thwarter,

 

I like reading the Queen’s English.  I like to

connect with what I am reading and I don’t

connect with fr.ee, or fr*e or some other spam

filter frustrator abomination of the English

language.

 

If what you are trying to sell me you need to

sneak past my filter, I want your message to be

screened. If you can state your pitch clearly and

I like don’t like your pitch, I want you to be

spammed, damned, and banned forever more!

 

If, on the other hand, I like your message, I want

to be connected immediately to your server, so my

order can be processed without delay. 

 

And I expect you to know the difference.

 

Any questions?



Talk about a backfire!

Posted by: bob parmelee
Under: Human Interest, Politics, Recent Posts
3 Mar 2009

President Obama and Prime Minister Brown touched upon the need to create a world regulating agency which would oversee all financial institutions — banking — everything, tracking all money moving anywhere.

So the bankers really blew it for themselves this time. No more international safe havens. No more protection from prying eyes.

What if all of a sudden, follow the money actually lead somewhere?

What if we could see the red stain of cash making a trail all the way from our pile in the desert back through Halliburton to Dick Cheney’s pocket? But that will never happen. Who would be brave enough to dip his toe in that river of molten lava. For all we know the last guy to disagree with Dick got his face shot off.

But maybe big oil, and big money, and the big guns got too big for their britches. (I hope — I don’t want this to pi** off anyone still important) Just maybe world government is the only way to effectively regulate big world-wide businesses.

Let’s see; from 8 a.m. to 9 a.m. I make $18(average country wage) and the guy responsible for losing trillions received just shy of a half a million for that same hour. Assuming we both have weekends off, of course.

Yeah, right, I want protect this guy’s right to put all that money into his pocket at the expense of my kids education, health care, clean air and the environment. Or do I?