The “bully pulpit” isn’t bullying anybody anymore.
12 Aug 2009
It seems impossible to believe that the President’s
mandate has been squashed already.
But facts are facts. The party of “no” can’t
promulgate any policies worth following but
they seem to be able to torpedo anything
which may benefit the “average” American.
The “average” American, by my definition,
is a person who works for a living. This precludes
the “fat cats” who have already earned or inherited
enough money to live forever. It does include
the “low cats” who can’t afford the price of a cup
of coffee at Starbucks. It includes about 300
million Americans.
It includes everybody everywhere who contributes
to the “industrial nations” statistics, or those who
belong to the wealthiest nations category
of which we are, temporarily, number one.
It includes those nations (28 of them) who have
better standards of living than ours. It includes
all those nations who have better health care
then we do. It includes every nation who educates
their children better than we do. It includes virtually
every nation included in the third world category…
It is time to change our statistics. Any politics
which contributed to the previous 40 years of failed
policies need to be jettisoned. Those who seek
to perpetuate those policies are either in the top
1% of income earners (it would be ridiculous to
suggest to these winners that they change what
works for them– voluntarily) or are those brain-dead
among us who have never have enjoyed the Eureka
moment which accompanies an original thought.
In other words, the incredible majority of Americans
who have been brainwashed into believing the drivel
of past administrations or current lobbyists are not
in a position to move us into a better place.
Either we get ahead of the curve or we will suffer
the disgrace of losers who populate the rubble of history.
This could be a fitting eulogy:
Fellow Romans,
We learned nothing from your failed republic. In fact,
we took your arrogance to a whole new level. We actually
try to outspend the rest of the combined budgets among the
planet’s various militarys on a military offensive budget
(misnomer = “defense”) against no certain enemy. Your
losing strategy to conquer the world we proudly embrace although
it will bury us in the rock pile of past great civilations like yours.
President Barak Obama needs to bully this nation into
the 21st century. And he needs to stick by his campaign
promises. All the arguments to the contrary are
assuring our speedy descent into a has been super power.
We are not far from Russia my friends. They are currently,
if not always, in the grip of gangsters who pillage and plunder
their economy at will. We’re on the edge.
Bob Parmelee Robert-Parmelee.blogspot.com
Talk about a backfire!
President Obama and Prime Minister Brown touched upon the need to create a world regulating agency which would oversee all financial institutions — banking — everything, tracking all money moving anywhere.
So the bankers really blew it for themselves this time. No more international safe havens. No more protection from prying eyes.
What if all of a sudden, follow the money actually lead somewhere?
What if we could see the red stain of cash making a trail all the way from our pile in the desert back through Halliburton to Dick Cheney’s pocket? But that will never happen. Who would be brave enough to dip his toe in that river of molten lava. For all we know the last guy to disagree with Dick got his face shot off.
But maybe big oil, and big money, and the big guns got too big for their britches. (I hope — I don’t want this to pi** off anyone still important) Just maybe world government is the only way to effectively regulate big world-wide businesses.
Let’s see; from 8 a.m. to 9 a.m. I make $18(average country wage) and the guy responsible for losing trillions received just shy of a half a million for that same hour. Assuming we both have weekends off, of course.
Yeah, right, I want protect this guy’s right to put all that money into his pocket at the expense of my kids education, health care, clean air and the environment. Or do I?
Bailouts and Bonuses
2 Jan 2009
If I had to choose…HEY! Wait a minute – why can’t I get both? The government is having a ball with our money these days. Just stick your hand out and something’s likely to land in it, especially if the Democrats have there way with the checkbook. “Spend now and worry about the tab later…” is roughly what I believe Obama said. Personally I don’t have kids, and being the selfish prick I am, the buy now let them pay later mentality kind of works for me.
Now the Big 3 fiasco is another color altogether. This is a matter of principal – not just ecomonics. The big 3 auto companies should be treated just like any other company with VC investment money. After the 1st round of financing, they get scrutinized, re-evaluated, and the decision is made whether or not 2nd round financing is warranted. Unfortunately, the VC investors in this case are the US taxpayers who have no say in their investment monies. It’s about time these big companies are held to the same standard as most other businesses – either keep up with current market demands or fall by the wayside. It’s not like they didn’t see this coming.
Now if all the freakonomic BS hasn’t chapped your ass already, take a look at this link and then come back and tell me your alright with your current financial status: Bonuses Baby!!!
Judges come from where?
To me the most important protection of our democracy
should be the insulation of our judicial system from corrupt
influences. If justice comes down to who has the most money,
society as we know it would disintegrate. For a society to
survive the people within it must, after all, believe in their elite.
And they must have trust in the fairness of their judicial
systems. The only other way to hold society together is
with a large internal “security” force.
In a national bestseller, “Personal Injuries”, Scott Turow
vividly describes what can go wrong when “The Judge” is on
the take. The story involves favorable rulings in personal
injury cases where insurance companies are on the hook
for huge settlements. Common wisdom holds that insurance
companies use the pretext of those monstrous settlements
to charge their customers outrageous fees for what are in
actuality rare cases. The lawyers get rich, the judges
(in these cases) get a nice bonus of some sort and the
insurance companies get to raise their rates. The plaintiffs
get hugely rewarded for their pain and suffering and as a final
tribute to a system gone horribly wrong, the evildoer is severely
punished. Everyone involved is the winner, the insurance company
pays off, and if there is a loser somewhere, no one cares.
WE, the majority of people in USA, have a firm belief in our
democracy (with a few detractors), and a strong backbone
of religious and moral convictions. And WE overwhelmingly
support our judicial system. I believe as a society WE feel shame
when the bad guy goes free (take OJ for example) or when the
good guy gets wrongly convicted (take the hundreds of inmates
recently freed from years of confinement by new DNA evidence).
So what in the world are WE thinking when WE allow the most
politically motivated, and by extension the most heavily influenced,
people in our society to –APPOINT– the judges who sit on the
highest benches in the land. Every honest person needs to believe
that the person presiding over a court of law, and possibly
sitting in judgment of him, will be impartial, which is inherently
an oxymoronic concept under these circumstances. Shouldn’t
WE the people be voting on these guys?
Teflon Ron
Incredible as it may seem, it appears the Illinois governor might be found innocent in a court of law for attempting to sell Obama’s vacated senate seat and expect (extort) numerous other favors for family and friends.
I think in the court of public opinion, however, he is as guilty as they come. But if they brought the case too soon there is every possibility that, because he hadn’t overtly (yet) committed any crime, he may not be found guilty of anything.
IMO whether or not he gets convicted he should not be permitted to appoint the next senator.
That PRIVILEDGE, to change political history for better or worse, for both Illinois and the Nation, should go to an honest man.
One thing is clear; Blagojevich’s pick will be bought and paid for.
Subscribe to Feed

